The foundation of StoryMill’s approach to writing and organizing is the scene. To figure out which style, and thus program, is the best choice for you, you’ll need to consider two big questions: what metaphors do you use for writing, and what specific features are most important for you? StoryMill: a novel framework However, for some people the time necessary to set up their own framework in Scrivener is well worth the effort because the program’s flexibility allows them to write most effectively. If StoryMill’s framework makes sense to you and you don’t have an urgent need for any of the features that are Scrivener-only, then StoryMill will be the easiest environment to write in. You can do most of the things in Scrivener that you can in StoryMill (with a few key exceptions), but it will be slightly more effort. In contrast, Scrivener is much more flexible and offers a larger number of features that you can pick and choose from to form your workflow. StoryMill’s approach is to provide you with a specific framework for writing and organizing, complemented with a focused group of powerful features. The truth is that regardless of your genre the deciding factor for which software to use will be a matter of style. The reason the fiction/non-fiction comparison is common is because StoryMill is explicitly focused on fiction (and doesn’t support screenplays at all, since that would steal sales from its companion software Montage) while Scrivener provides a general writing metaphor that can apply to either genre equally well (with limited support for screenplay formatting and footnotes).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |